Tuesday, September 15, 2020

The Electoral College Map (9/15/20)

Update for September 15.


The race for the White House is now halfway through September and there are just seven weeks until election day on November 3. This Tuesday -- seven weeks out -- brought seven new polls from four states, all of which have been competitive in the 21st century. But one -- Virginia -- has slipped over the course of those twenty years from a reliably red state to something that appears to be fairly comfortably blue now.

But what is interesting about this group of polls and the first half of September is how little has really changed on the surface. The month began with Ohio pushing over the partisan line in Toss Up Trump territory, but that projected 335-203 Biden advantage in the Electoral College has held since then. But again, that is on the surface. Underneath, there has been some narrowing in a handful of states. Notably, Arizona and Florida have drawn closer, but the latter is closing at a quicker clip as the two are seemingly on a trajectory to converge in the Biden +3-4 point range if the course remains on the same path. North Carolina, too, has tracked down some in the Biden +1-2 point range. Yet, none of those states are essential to the former vice president reaching 270 electoral votes as the Electoral College Spectrum below clearly demonstrates. Even in those states, Trump has work to do. Biden sits at 48 in Arizona, 49 in Florida and 47 in North Carolina in the averages here at FHQ. Trump, then, in states the president will need to get to 270, will need to either bring Biden down some and/or out-perform the former vice president among undecideds (or persuade a lot more Trump supporters to turn out). Obviously, nothing is set in stone, but with just 49 days left -- and voters already voting -- time is running out.


Polling Quick Hits:
Florida
(Biden 50, Trump 50 via Florida Atlantic | Biden 49, Trump 46 via Monmouth)
[Current FHQ margin: Biden +3.89]
There were a pair of polls out of the Sunshine state on Tuesday and both show a close race for those 29 electoral votes. The tie in the Florida Atlantic poll is pretty much par for the course in the series of four polls now in 2020. And yes, this series also fits the now familiar pattern. The early polls in January and March showed a nearly tied race both times. But in May, Biden jumped out to a six point lead. While that edge was a little early for the Biden surge in June/July, that was the last poll in a series that is now back to tied. Ride the roller coaster if one must, but recognize also that there is in battleground state after battleground state a pattern of surge and decline in these state-level polls. Things are right back to where they were in the spring: Biden ahead, and by smaller margins than over the summer, but ahead where it will count the most in November.

The Monmouth poll is the university's first survey of the Sunshine state, so there is no direct comparison. However, FHQ will note that our policy has been to take the "low turnout" version of the polls for the sake of continuity. Even if one trades out the low for high turnout version (50-45, Biden), the former vice president's lead only grows by 0.05 points. Either one one looks at, they are both within the ranges in which both candidates have been in Florida polling in September so far.


North Carolina
(Biden 47, Trump 47 via Survey USA | Trump 48, Biden 46 via Trafalgar Group | Biden 49, Trump 46 via CNN)
[Current FHQ margin: Biden +1.48]
The trio of surveys recently in the field in the Tar Heel state ran the gamut of results in September polls there. Everyone had something to latch on to. Trafalgar had the president ahead, Survey USA found a tied race and CNN had Biden marginally in front. It was the first poll for each of Trafalgar and CNN, so the focus will be on the series from Survey USA. There have been three Survey USA polls conducted in North Carolina in calendar 2020, but this latest is the first since April. Both of the earlier polls had the former vice president up by four or five. And while there was no data in the intervening period in which Biden would have typically jumped out to a larger advantage, this latest poll breaks with the pattern mentioned above. Biden may have peaked in a hypothetical June Survey USA poll of the state, but even if he had, then that lead would have decayed more than to the (winter and) spring levels. This poll, then, reflects more than that which is something of a silver lining for Trump in a state the president needs.


Virginia
(Biden 53, Trump 39)
[Current FHQ margin: Biden +11.71]
The latest survey in the field from Virginia Commonwealth of the Old Dominion shows what most polls there this year have found: Virginia is not a swing/battleground state in 2020. And this VCU series of polls has been pretty consistent through the year. Biden has mostly been at or above 50 percent there while Trump has instead hovered around 40 percent. And that is basically where the FHQ averages are for both candidates right now, Biden 51-40 (rounded).


Wisconsin
(Biden 52, Trump 42)
[Current FHQ margin: Biden +6.37]
Finally, the CNN survey of Wisconsin -- also its first in the Badger state -- catches the eye if only because of that double digit lead Biden carries in a state Trump won by a fraction of a point in 2016. But the surprising thing perhaps about Wisconsin polling right now is not this CNN poll but rather that it is not out of the ordinary for recent polling there. Yes, it has Biden on the high side of his range and Trump on the low side of his, but the consistency of these mid- to upper single digit Biden leads in the Badger state is what continues to break with FHQ's expectations. The narrowing just has not really come to Wisconsin like it has in some other battlegrounds. Now, there is still time for that to change, but there have been enough of those sorts of polls cited above to buttress the former vice president's roughly six point lead there.



NOTE: A description of the methodology behind the graduated weighted average of 2020 state-level polling that FHQ uses for these projections can be found here.


The Electoral College Spectrum1
MA-112
(14)
CT-7
(162)
WI-10
(252)
AK-3
(125)
UT-6
(60)
HI-4
(18)
NJ-14
(176)
PA-203
NE CD2-1
(273 | 286)
SC-9
(122)
IN-11
(54)
CA-55
(73)
OR-7
(183)
NV-6
(279 | 265)
MO-10
(113)
KY-8
(43)
VT-3
(76)
NM-5
(188)
FL-29
(308 | 259)
MT-3
(103)
AL-9
(35)
NY-29
(105)
VA-13
(201)
AZ-11
(319 | 230)
KS-6
NE CD1-1
(100)
ID-4
(26)
WA-12
(117)
CO-9
(210)
NC-15
ME CD2-1
(335 | 219)
MS-6
(93)
ND-3
(22)
MD-10
(127)
ME-2
(212)
OH-18
(203)
AR-6
(87)
SD-3
(19)
IL-20
(147)
MN-10
(222)
IA-6
(185)
NE-2
(81)
OK-7
(16)
ME CD1-1
RI-4
(152)
MI-16
(238)
GA-16
(179)
LA-8
(79)
WV-5
(9)
DE-3
(155)
NH-4
(242)
TX-38
(163)
TN-11
(71)
WY-3
NE CD3-1
(4)
1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.

2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he or she won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Trump won all the states up to and including Pennsylvania (Biden's toss up states plus the Pennsylvania), he would have 286 electoral votes. Trump's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Biden's number is on the left and Trump's is on the right in bold italics.


To keep the figure to 50 cells, Washington, DC and its three electoral votes are included in the beginning total on the Democratic side of the spectrum. The District has historically been the most Democratic state in the Electoral College.

3 Pennsylvania
 is the state where Biden crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election, the tipping point state. The tipping point cell is shaded in yellow to denote that and the font color is adjusted to attempt to reflect the category in which the state is.

There were some significant additions to the polling dataset at FHQ today in a handful of states that are going to decide the election in November. But it was the state that is most comfortably in Biden's column -- Virginia -- that changed and not Florida, North Carolina or Wisconsin. The VCU pushed the average in the commonwealth up enough to nudge Virginia past both Maine and Colorado on the Spectrum above. But, to be clear, all three are tightly bunched with average margins of 11-12 points at the moment. If that passes for a change -- and it does -- then it is a small one. Meanwhile, the averages in both Florida and North Carolina ticked down but continue to advantage Biden. Wisconsin, on the other hand, saw its FHQ average margin nudge up slightly on the weight of that double digit CNN poll. None of the three battlegrounds moved in the rank order on the Spectrum.

Florida may not have budged in the order above but it finally moved off the Watch List. The Sunshine state is no longer within a fraction of a point of possibly moving into the Lean Biden category. It is just a solid Biden toss up as of now. That trims the List to just nine states and districts and still only three that would potentially alter the overall projected tally at FHQ (all of which are on the cusp of potential moves into the Biden coalition of states).

Halfway through September, however, there was a little bit of good news for both camps, but little change, something that continues to be a feather in the former vice president's cap.



Where things stood at FHQ on September 15 (or close to it) in...
2016
2012
2008



--
NOTE: Distinctions are made between states based on how much they favor one candidate or another. States with a margin greater than 10 percent between Biden and Trump are "Strong" states. Those with a margin of 5 to 10 percent "Lean" toward one of the two (presumptive) nominees. Finally, states with a spread in the graduated weighted averages of both the candidates' shares of polling support less than 5 percent are "Toss Up" states. The darker a state is shaded in any of the figures here, the more strongly it is aligned with one of the candidates. Not all states along or near the boundaries between categories are close to pushing over into a neighboring group. Those most likely to switch -- those within a percentage point of the various lines of demarcation -- are included on the Watch List below.

The Watch List1
State
Potential Switch
Georgia
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Biden
Iowa
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Biden
Mississippi
from Strong Trump
to Lean Trump
Missouri
from Lean Trump
to Toss Up Trump
Nebraska CD2
from Lean Biden
to Toss Up Biden
Nevada
from Toss Up Biden
to Lean Biden
Ohio
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Biden
Pennsylvania
from Lean Biden
to Toss Up Biden
South Carolina
from Lean Trump
to Toss Up Trump
1 Graduated weighted average margin within a fraction of a point of changing categories.

--
Methodological Note: In past years, FHQ has tried some different ways of dealing with states with no polls or just one poll in the early rounds of these projections. It does help that the least polled states are often the least competitive. The only shortcoming is that those states may be a little off in the order in the Spectrum. In earlier cycles, a simple average of the state's three previous cycles has been used. But in 2016, FHQ strayed from that and constructed an average swing from 2012 to 2016 that was applied to states. That method, however, did little to prevent anomalies like the Kansas poll that had Clinton ahead from biasing the averages. In 2016, the early average swing in the aggregate was  too small to make much difference anyway. For 2020, FHQ has utilized an average swing among states that were around a little polled state in the rank ordering on election day in 2016. If there is just one poll in Delaware in 2020, for example, then maybe it is reasonable to account for what the comparatively greater amount of polling tells us about the changes in Connecticut, New Jersey and New Mexico. Or perhaps the polling in Iowa, Mississippi and South Carolina so far tells us a bit about what may be happening in Alaska where no public polling has been released. That will hopefully work a bit better than the overall average that may end up a bit more muted.


--
Related posts:
The Electoral College Map (9/14/20)

The Electoral College Map (9/13/20)

The Electoral College Map (9/12/20)


Follow FHQ on TwitterInstagram and Facebook or subscribe by Email.

Monday, September 14, 2020

The Electoral College Map (9/14/20)

Update for September 14.


Changes (September 14)
StateBeforeAfter
Nebraska CD2
Toss Up Biden
Lean Biden
The countdown to election day continues as just 50 days separate the 2020 presidential campaign from November 3. There was no fanfare to mark the occasion, certainly not on the polling front. Like Sunday, there were just two polls added to the mix, a couple of western states neither of which looked all that competitive. And that fact is more surprising in Toss Up Arizona where Biden's ten point advantage upped the margin enough in the Grand Canyon state to nudge Nebraska's second congressional district back over into Lean Biden territory. Again, with scant polling out of the Omaha-centered district, the averages there are linked to states that finished around it in 2016. The swings that have hit states like Arizona, Florida and Michigan, for example, have some bearing on deciding the positioning of NE CD2. And that wide margin was just enough to make the district a lean again just two days after it drifted over into the toss up category. The issue is less that the district is a toss up or lean, but more that it is positioned right on that line between the two categories.

And that is not without significance. For now, NE CD2 sits just inside the lower end of the Lean Biden category.


Polling Quick Hits:
Arizona
(Biden 52, Trump 42)
[Current FHQ margin: Biden +3.47]
OH Predictive Insights was last in the field in Arizona back at the beginning of August before the conventions. At that time Biden led but by a more modest -- not to mention true to the averages -- four points. In the month and some change since, the former vice president's advantage has ballooned to ten points with Biden above 50 percent. But the OH Predictive timeline has bucked the trend recently discussed in this space. Biden had more pedestrian margins in key battlegrounds in the spring but saw them increase as the summer set in. That was Biden's peak in many polls, both state-level and national. But in the time since that summer surge, Biden more or less regressed to the pre- surge mean. Well, in the OH Predictive trend line, the opposite happened. Biden was at or above 50 percent in their Arizona surveys back in April and May only to dip below that in July and August. Now, the former vice president has returned to that spring level of support, and the president has sunk to his lowest point in the series. Regardless, this one stands out from the rest of the recent polls in the field in the Grand Canyon state. Those have shown a closer race.


Colorado
(Biden 50, Trump 39)
[Current FHQ margin: Biden +11.62]
To the northeast of Arizona, things look much as they have in Colorado all year: comfortably in Biden's column. The Centennial state used to be like Arizona, a more consistently competitive state in the first few cycles of the 21st century. That just has not been the case in 2020 and the survey conducted by Global Strategy Group there does little to break from that. Of the 12 polls conducted in Colorado, Biden has been at or above 50 percent in ten of them while Trump has been at or below 40 percent in half. Both of those conditions are met in this poll and that really is the state of things in Colorado in 2020 in a nutshell.



NOTE: A description of the methodology behind the graduated weighted average of 2020 state-level polling that FHQ uses for these projections can be found here.


The Electoral College Spectrum1
MA-112
(14)
CT-7
(162)
WI-10
(252)
AK-3
(125)
UT-6
(60)
HI-4
(18)
NJ-14
(176)
PA-203
NE CD2-1
(273 | 286)
SC-9
(122)
IN-11
(54)
CA-55
(73)
OR-7
(183)
NV-6
(279 | 265)
MO-10
(113)
KY-8
(43)
VT-3
(76)
NM-5
(188)
FL-29
(308 | 259)
MT-3
(103)
AL-9
(35)
NY-29
(105)
CO-9
(197)
AZ-11
(319 | 230)
KS-6
NE CD1-1
(100)
ID-4
(26)
WA-12
(117)
ME-2
(199)
NC-15
ME CD2-1
(335 | 219)
MS-6
(93)
ND-3
(22)
MD-10
(127)
VA-13
(212)
OH-18
(203)
AR-6
(87)
SD-3
(19)
IL-20
(147)
MN-10
(222)
IA-6
(185)
NE-2
(81)
OK-7
(16)
ME CD1-1
RI-4
(152)
MI-16
(238)
GA-16
(179)
LA-8
(79)
WV-5
(9)
DE-3
(155)
NH-4
(242)
TX-38
(163)
TN-11
(71)
WY-3
NE CD3-1
(4)
1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.

2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he or she won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Trump won all the states up to and including Pennsylvania (Biden's toss up states plus the Pennsylvania), he would have 286 electoral votes. Trump's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Biden's number is on the left and Trump's is on the right in bold italics.


To keep the figure to 50 cells, Washington, DC and its three electoral votes are included in the beginning total on the Democratic side of the spectrum. The District has historically been the most Democratic state in the Electoral College.

3 Pennsylvania
 is the state where Biden crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election, the tipping point state. The tipping point cell is shaded in yellow to denote that and the font color is adjusted to attempt to reflect the category in which the state is.

The map gets a slight change as the new work week gets underway, but it is a limited shift that also affects the Spectrum and Watch List. Nebraska's second district shifting back onto Lean Biden turf means that it once again joins Pennsylvania on the tipping point cell in the rank order depicted on the Spectrum. It also flips its potential switch on the List for the second time in three days. But again, please note that that may be normal for next bit as the district is so close to the five point line separating Toss Up from Lean. And as was the case today, any NE CD2 changes are likely to come not from polls of the district, but from new data out of states that were close to it in the order in 2016. Florida is already on the List below, but add Arizona and Michigan to that as well. Above average margins in polls in those states may bolster the Lean Biden positioning for the district, but any narrowing may have the opposite effect.



Where things stood at FHQ on September 14 (or close to it) in...
2016
2012
2008



--
NOTE: Distinctions are made between states based on how much they favor one candidate or another. States with a margin greater than 10 percent between Biden and Trump are "Strong" states. Those with a margin of 5 to 10 percent "Lean" toward one of the two (presumptive) nominees. Finally, states with a spread in the graduated weighted averages of both the candidates' shares of polling support less than 5 percent are "Toss Up" states. The darker a state is shaded in any of the figures here, the more strongly it is aligned with one of the candidates. Not all states along or near the boundaries between categories are close to pushing over into a neighboring group. Those most likely to switch -- those within a percentage point of the various lines of demarcation -- are included on the Watch List below.

The Watch List1
State
Potential Switch
Florida
from Toss Up Biden
to Lean Biden
Georgia
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Biden
Iowa
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Biden
Mississippi
from Strong Trump
to Lean Trump
Missouri
from Lean Trump
to Toss Up Trump
Nebraska CD2
from Lean Biden
to Toss Up Biden
Nevada
from Toss Up Biden
to Lean Biden
Ohio
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Biden
Pennsylvania
from Lean Biden
to Toss Up Biden
South Carolina
from Lean Trump
to Toss Up Trump
1 Graduated weighted average margin within a fraction of a point of changing categories.

--
Methodological Note: In past years, FHQ has tried some different ways of dealing with states with no polls or just one poll in the early rounds of these projections. It does help that the least polled states are often the least competitive. The only shortcoming is that those states may be a little off in the order in the Spectrum. In earlier cycles, a simple average of the state's three previous cycles has been used. But in 2016, FHQ strayed from that and constructed an average swing from 2012 to 2016 that was applied to states. That method, however, did little to prevent anomalies like the Kansas poll that had Clinton ahead from biasing the averages. In 2016, the early average swing in the aggregate was  too small to make much difference anyway. For 2020, FHQ has utilized an average swing among states that were around a little polled state in the rank ordering on election day in 2016. If there is just one poll in Delaware in 2020, for example, then maybe it is reasonable to account for what the comparatively greater amount of polling tells us about the changes in Connecticut, New Jersey and New Mexico. Or perhaps the polling in Iowa, Mississippi and South Carolina so far tells us a bit about what may be happening in Alaska where no public polling has been released. That will hopefully work a bit better than the overall average that may end up a bit more muted.


--
Related posts:
The Electoral College Map (9/13/20)

The Electoral College Map (9/12/20)

The Electoral College Map (9/11/20)


Follow FHQ on TwitterInstagram and Facebook or subscribe by Email.

Sunday, September 13, 2020

The Electoral College Map (9/13/20)

Update for September 13.


Sunday brought a couple of new polls from a pair of target states that are familiar territory if one read Saturday's update. To top it off, both YouGov polls in Arizona and Minnesota were both quite close to the existing FHQ averages for both Biden and Trump in the two states. That was not necessary a recipe for change, significant or otherwise, in the averages around here, but it does help to further clarify the state of the race in these two states.


Polling Quick Hits:
Arizona
(Biden 47, Trump 44)
[Current FHQ margin: Biden +3.28]
The latest YouGov battleground tracker survey of Arizona is its first update there since an early July poll, a period during which Joe Biden enjoyed a bit of a surge nationwide. That surge has ebbed in some states through the lens of other pollsters' efforts, but that is not exactly clear here. In fact, the former vice president and Trump were knotted at 46 two months ago. Biden has subsequently broken that tie in the series, inching out to a lead just within the margin of error. Yet, the Biden advantage in the state has consistently been above three points here at FHQ. This did little to change that. The survey actually further buttressed the existing averages in the Grand Canyon state since it tracked so closely with the 48-44 (rounded) lead Biden has there in the FHQ averages.


Minnesota
(Biden 50, Trump 41)
[Current FHQ margin: Biden +7.58]
Different day, different pollster. But the results were the exact same today as they were on Saturday in Minnesota. The YouGov battleground tracker, like the Siena poll a day ago, found Biden up by nine. And like the Arizona poll above it tracks very closely to the FHQ average shares of support for both candidates. Trump runs a little behind his average in the survey but Biden's is right on target. Unlike Arizona, this is the first time that YouGov was in the field in Minnesota, so there is no direct point of comparison. However, of all the polls that have been conducted in the Land of 10,000 Lakes in September, Biden has been at or above 50 percent in half of them while Trump has struggled to break into the mid-40s.



NOTE: A description of the methodology behind the graduated weighted average of 2020 state-level polling that FHQ uses for these projections can be found here.


The Electoral College Spectrum1
MA-112
(14)
CT-7
(162)
WI-10
(252)
AK-3
(125)
UT-6
(60)
HI-4
(18)
NJ-14
(176)
PA-203
(272 | 286)
SC-9
(122)
IN-11
(54)
CA-55
(73)
OR-7
(183)
NE CD2-1
NV-6
(279 | 266)
MO-10
(113)
KY-8
(43)
VT-3
(76)
NM-5
(188)
FL-29
(308 | 259)
MT-3
(103)
AL-9
(35)
NY-29
(105)
CO-9
(197)
AZ-11
(319 | 230)
KS-6
NE CD1-1
(100)
ID-4
(26)
WA-12
(117)
ME-2
(199)
NC-15
ME CD2-1
(335 | 219)
MS-6
(93)
ND-3
(22)
MD-10
(127)
VA-13
(212)
OH-18
(203)
AR-6
(87)
SD-3
(19)
IL-20
(147)
MN-10
(222)
IA-6
(185)
NE-2
(81)
OK-7
(16)
ME CD1-1
RI-4
(152)
MI-16
(238)
GA-16
(179)
LA-8
(79)
WV-5
(9)
DE-3
(155)
NH-4
(242)
TX-38
(163)
TN-11
(71)
WY-3
NE CD3-1
(4)
1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.

2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he or she won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Trump won all the states up to and including Pennsylvania (Biden's toss up states plus the Pennsylvania), he would have 286 electoral votes. Trump's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Biden's number is on the left and Trump's is on the right in bold italics.


To keep the figure to 50 cells, Washington, DC and its three electoral votes are included in the beginning total on the Democratic side of the spectrum. The District has historically been the most Democratic state in the Electoral College.

3 Pennsylvania
 is the state where Biden crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election, the tipping point state. The tipping point cell is shaded in yellow to denote that and the font color is adjusted to attempt to reflect the category in which the state is.

Needless to say, with a couple of additions that so closely reflected the pre-existing averages in Arizona and Minnesota, not much change at FHQ on the precipice of a new work week. The map, Spectrum and Watch List all remain unchanged from a day ago. That means that Pennsylvania retains the distinction of being the tipping point state, where Biden crosses over 270 electoral votes or Trump would if his campaign is able to change course in the states between the partisan line and the Keystone state. Yet, Pennsylvania continues to be a Lean Biden state, more than five points out of the president's grasp. That is the ground he has to make up over the next 51 days.



Where things stood at FHQ on September 13 (or close to it) in...
2016
2012
2008



--
NOTE: Distinctions are made between states based on how much they favor one candidate or another. States with a margin greater than 10 percent between Biden and Trump are "Strong" states. Those with a margin of 5 to 10 percent "Lean" toward one of the two (presumptive) nominees. Finally, states with a spread in the graduated weighted averages of both the candidates' shares of polling support less than 5 percent are "Toss Up" states. The darker a state is shaded in any of the figures here, the more strongly it is aligned with one of the candidates. Not all states along or near the boundaries between categories are close to pushing over into a neighboring group. Those most likely to switch -- those within a percentage point of the various lines of demarcation -- are included on the Watch List below.

The Watch List1
State
Potential Switch
Florida
from Toss Up Biden
to Lean Biden
Georgia
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Biden
Iowa
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Biden
Mississippi
from Strong Trump
to Lean Trump
Missouri
from Lean Trump
to Toss Up Trump
Nebraska CD2
from Toss Up Biden
to Lean Biden
Nevada
from Toss Up Biden
to Lean Biden
Ohio
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Biden
Pennsylvania
from Lean Biden
to Toss Up Biden
South Carolina
from Lean Trump
to Toss Up Trump
1 Graduated weighted average margin within a fraction of a point of changing categories.

--
Methodological Note: In past years, FHQ has tried some different ways of dealing with states with no polls or just one poll in the early rounds of these projections. It does help that the least polled states are often the least competitive. The only shortcoming is that those states may be a little off in the order in the Spectrum. In earlier cycles, a simple average of the state's three previous cycles has been used. But in 2016, FHQ strayed from that and constructed an average swing from 2012 to 2016 that was applied to states. That method, however, did little to prevent anomalies like the Kansas poll that had Clinton ahead from biasing the averages. In 2016, the early average swing in the aggregate was  too small to make much difference anyway. For 2020, FHQ has utilized an average swing among states that were around a little polled state in the rank ordering on election day in 2016. If there is just one poll in Delaware in 2020, for example, then maybe it is reasonable to account for what the comparatively greater amount of polling tells us about the changes in Connecticut, New Jersey and New Mexico. Or perhaps the polling in Iowa, Mississippi and South Carolina so far tells us a bit about what may be happening in Alaska where no public polling has been released. That will hopefully work a bit better than the overall average that may end up a bit more muted.


--
Related posts:
The Electoral College Map (9/12/20)

The Electoral College Map (9/11/20)

The Electoral College Map (9/10/20)


Follow FHQ on TwitterInstagram and Facebook or subscribe by Email.

Saturday, September 12, 2020

The Electoral College Map (9/12/20)

Update for September 12.


Changes (September 12)
StateBeforeAfter
Nebraska CD2
Lean Biden
Toss Up Biden
The weekend began with a bang on the polling front. Siena and the Upshot (NYT) together released a round of surveys from a quartet of states that is all being targeted by the both campaigns, but with a couple -- Nevada and New Hampshire -- that have seen far less polling activity than their margins here at FHQ would otherwise indicate. Those updates are welcome, providing a bit more information about the state of play in each. And while Trump may be stuck in the low 40s in all four states, Biden is not that far out in front of him (with the exception of Minnesota).

Perhaps more importantly, since Nebraska's second congressional district has just one survey in calendar 2020, its averages remain tethered to the swings in other states that finished around it in 2016. Narrowing margins in states like Arizona, Florida and Michigan have nudged the FHQ average margin in the Omaha-based district down below the Lean/Toss up barrier on the Biden side of the partisan line. But the main thing with NE CD 2 is that it is very closely aligned with that five point line at the moment. While it is by definition a Toss Up, it is only barely so right now (currently Biden +4.99). And that is information that should be shared since it is also so close to the tipping point.


Polling Quick Hits:
Arizona
(Biden 50, Trump 48)
[Current FHQ margin: Biden +3.29]
The only new survey on Saturday that was not a part of the Siena wave was from Gravis Marketing out of the Grand Canyon state. Arizona has been close, but has consistently been tipped toward Biden. The former vice president has recently been in the upper 40s while Trump has tended to be in the mid-40s with some broader variability. The margin in this poll, then, is consistent with margins elsewhere, but both candidates are running ahead of their averages established here at FHQ. But the reality is that, once in the upper 3s, the margin has gradually ticked down closer to three points during September. That said, this poll is in contrast with the last Gravis poll of Arizona back in June. During Biden's peak nationally, Trump led in that survey by four. Poll over poll, Biden gained five points while lost one.


Minnesota
(Biden 50, Trump 41)
[Current FHQ margin: Biden +7.48]
Further north in the Land of 10,000 Lakes, Siena/NYT found the former vice president up nine points, which does not make Minnesota look like a state that should be targeted down the stretch. Clinton did edge Trump there by one in 2016, but the average swing nationwide toward the Democrats since then would put Minnesota about Biden +8.5. That nine point advantage in the Siena survey is pretty consistent with that. However, that differs from some of the other polls in the series. The big thing for the Trump campaign in Minnesota moving is that Biden is already above 50 percent in this poll and at FHQ.


Nevada
(Biden 46, Trump 42)
[Current FHQ margin: Biden +4.47]
One of those states that differs in the Siena/NYT series from the picture painted in Minnesota is underpolled Nevada. There just has not been a very robust timeline of polls in the Silver state in calendar 2020, so there really is no firm grasp on how things evolved or did not during Biden's early summer surge. But what can be said is that in what little polling there has been in Nevada, Biden has tended to have a lower share of support than in other states that were around Nevada in the order at the end of the 2016 campaign. Unlike in Minnesota, Biden is and has been in the mid-40s in Nevada and the margins have typically been in the mid-single digits. Trump's work there is less about combining efforts to improve his stock and tear down Biden than it is focusing on the former. And that is less likely to be about the type of persuasion that would woo undecideds and more about ensuring that more of the right people turn out to vote.


New Hampshire
(Biden 45, Trump 42)
[Current FHQ margin: Biden +6.45]
A state that has been closely aligned with Nevada in the presidential election cycles of the recent past is New Hampshire. And that is true in the Siena/NYT surveys as well. The Granite state is another that was a close Hillary Clinton win in 2016 and where one would, if assuming a uniform swing since 2016, expect the margin to be a little higher in 2020. The FHQ margin there is over six points, but even that change runs a little under the average swing from four years ago (~7.5 points). That divergence is even more acute in the poll released today, where Biden leads by just three. Both candidates are running behind the pace set in 2016, but undecided/other remains fairly high in this poll. That is not a dynamic witnessed elsewhere, but it something -- low survey standing of both candidates -- that Trump took advantage of four years ago.


Wisconsin
(Biden 48, Trump 43)
[Current FHQ margin: Biden +6.28]
Finally, if it is a day that ends in Y then there is probably a new poll out in Wisconsin. And yes, the Badger state was part of the Siena/NYT wave as well, the only state among the four that did not stay blue in 2016. Like Minnesota, this poll just "fits in" better with other recent survey work in the state. That five point Biden edge is consistent with other polls in the Badger state. But there is more polling in Minnesota and Wisconsin to more clearly indicate that than in either Nevada or New Hampshire. But this one is pretty close to the FHQ average there where Biden is ahead 49-43. 



NOTE: A description of the methodology behind the graduated weighted average of 2020 state-level polling that FHQ uses for these projections can be found here.


The Electoral College Spectrum1
MA-112
(14)
CT-7
(162)
WI-10
(252)
AK-3
(125)
UT-6
(60)
HI-4
(18)
NJ-14
(176)
PA-203
(272 | 286)
SC-9
(122)
IN-11
(54)
CA-55
(73)
OR-7
(183)
NE CD2-1
NV-6
(279 | 266)
MO-10
(113)
KY-8
(43)
VT-3
(76)
NM-5
(188)
FL-29
(308 | 259)
MT-3
(103)
AL-9
(35)
NY-29
(105)
CO-9
(197)
AZ-11
(319 | 230)
KS-6
NE CD1-1
(100)
ID-4
(26)
WA-12
(117)
ME-2
(199)
NC-15
ME CD2-1
(335 | 219)
MS-6
(93)
ND-3
(22)
MD-10
(127)
VA-13
(212)
OH-18
(203)
AR-6
(87)
SD-3
(19)
IL-20
(147)
MN-10
(222)
IA-6
(185)
NE-2
(81)
OK-7
(16)
ME CD1-1
RI-4
(152)
MI-16
(238)
GA-16
(179)
LA-8
(79)
WV-5
(9)
DE-3
(155)
NH-4
(242)
TX-38
(163)
TN-11
(71)
WY-3
NE CD3-1
(4)
1 Follow the link for a detailed explanation on how to read the Electoral College Spectrum.

2 The numbers in the parentheses refer to the number of electoral votes a candidate would have if he or she won all the states ranked prior to that state. If, for example, Trump won all the states up to and including Pennsylvania (Biden's toss up states plus the Pennsylvania), he would have 286 electoral votes. Trump's numbers are only totaled through the states he would need in order to get to 270. In those cases, Biden's number is on the left and Trump's is on the right in bold italics.


To keep the figure to 50 cells, Washington, DC and its three electoral votes are included in the beginning total on the Democratic side of the spectrum. The District has historically been the most Democratic state in the Electoral College.

3 Pennsylvania
 is the state where Biden crosses the 270 electoral vote threshold to win the presidential election, the tipping point state. The tipping point cell is shaded in yellow to denote that and the font color is adjusted to attempt to reflect the category in which the state is.

FHQ could take this opportunity to once again decry the lack of polling in Nevada and New Hampshire, but instead, thanks to Siena for wading into both to get a sense of what the race looks like in each. And the take home is probably "closer than one might otherwise think." Still, that had little measurable impact on either state at FHQ. The margins dropped in both, but Nevada and New Hampshire not only stayed in the categories they were in a day ago, but they also retained their positions in the order on the Electoral College Spectrum. Both are on the Biden side of Wisconsin despite looking closer in this Siena wave. Meanwhile, Minnesota, still closely aligned with Michigan in the order, switched places with the Great Lakes state after inching under it earlier in the week.

The Watch List line up below remains the same ten states as yesterday, but the possible switch in Nebraska's 2nd has flipped since then. It is now a Toss Up Biden state within range of once again becoming a Lean Biden.



Where things stood at FHQ on September 12 (or close to it) in...
2016
2012
2008



--
NOTE: Distinctions are made between states based on how much they favor one candidate or another. States with a margin greater than 10 percent between Biden and Trump are "Strong" states. Those with a margin of 5 to 10 percent "Lean" toward one of the two (presumptive) nominees. Finally, states with a spread in the graduated weighted averages of both the candidates' shares of polling support less than 5 percent are "Toss Up" states. The darker a state is shaded in any of the figures here, the more strongly it is aligned with one of the candidates. Not all states along or near the boundaries between categories are close to pushing over into a neighboring group. Those most likely to switch -- those within a percentage point of the various lines of demarcation -- are included on the Watch List below.

The Watch List1
State
Potential Switch
Florida
from Toss Up Biden
to Lean Biden
Georgia
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Biden
Iowa
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Biden
Mississippi
from Strong Trump
to Lean Trump
Missouri
from Lean Trump
to Toss Up Trump
Nebraska CD2
from Toss Up Biden
to Lean Biden
Nevada
from Toss Up Biden
to Lean Biden
Ohio
from Toss Up Trump
to Toss Up Biden
Pennsylvania
from Lean Biden
to Toss Up Biden
South Carolina
from Lean Trump
to Toss Up Trump
1 Graduated weighted average margin within a fraction of a point of changing categories.

--
Methodological Note: In past years, FHQ has tried some different ways of dealing with states with no polls or just one poll in the early rounds of these projections. It does help that the least polled states are often the least competitive. The only shortcoming is that those states may be a little off in the order in the Spectrum. In earlier cycles, a simple average of the state's three previous cycles has been used. But in 2016, FHQ strayed from that and constructed an average swing from 2012 to 2016 that was applied to states. That method, however, did little to prevent anomalies like the Kansas poll that had Clinton ahead from biasing the averages. In 2016, the early average swing in the aggregate was  too small to make much difference anyway. For 2020, FHQ has utilized an average swing among states that were around a little polled state in the rank ordering on election day in 2016. If there is just one poll in Delaware in 2020, for example, then maybe it is reasonable to account for what the comparatively greater amount of polling tells us about the changes in Connecticut, New Jersey and New Mexico. Or perhaps the polling in Iowa, Mississippi and South Carolina so far tells us a bit about what may be happening in Alaska where no public polling has been released. That will hopefully work a bit better than the overall average that may end up a bit more muted.


--
Related posts:
The Electoral College Map (9/11/20)

The Electoral College Map (9/10/20)




Follow FHQ on TwitterInstagram and Facebook or subscribe by Email.