tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6719252574677567989.post77932192604411616..comments2024-03-26T05:22:08.256-04:00Comments on Frontloading HQ: Washington State's Double Dip, Polls for the Other February States and Revoting in Florida and MichiganJosh Putnamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06301836432446874997noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6719252574677567989.post-63882621742282104842008-02-07T20:01:00.000-05:002008-02-07T20:01:00.000-05:00Those court cases wouldn't go anywhere anyway. Th...Those court cases wouldn't go anywhere anyway. The courts have shown no inclination to get involved in these nomination battles. They always yield to party rules. <BR/><BR/>It won't get to that point anyway. Both Obama and Clinton know that they have to keep it somewhat civil or the party runs the risk of squandering a real opportunity in 2008.Josh Putnamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06301836432446874997noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6719252574677567989.post-40544458010361829322008-02-07T10:39:00.000-05:002008-02-07T10:39:00.000-05:00AT first I thought you had misspelled 'revolting'...AT first I thought you had misspelled 'revolting' when talking about Michigan and Florida 'revoting'. I think the caucus idea is a good one. It certainly beats the idea of a lawsuit settling the case, particularly if the lawsuit results in seating the Hillary delegates in August to give her the nomination and then being overturned in October to hand the nomination to Obama and overturned again by the Supreme Court on January 15 to hand the Presidency back to Hillary. Maybe a little far-fetched, but one vote on the Supreme Court settled a recent Presidential elction if I recall correctly. This scenario would be even more interesting if Clinton and Obama were on the same ticket.Roberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03379192575044761972noreply@blogger.com